cheap beats by dre ous sections all hav

Of, so whether say that the Marxism can not criticize machine materialism and only heart dialectics?Of course not BE.So say, author's this kind of"BE holding in high esteem to cultivate in the cultural tradition of nature and cosmos of" reason, canning not become mankind should hold in high esteem a natural theory according to.In addition, the author says"Mr. Ping You Lan has already once discussed similar standpoint:Western people's comprehension toward sky and awe, exist status to the mankind of anxious and deeply falsely unconscious, caused a western philosophy traditional medium knowledge theory.Thus, can also comprehend in science tradition particularly for the deep west, why produced "is the most typical of religion" just-Christianity."Really a lot of followers that is all Christianity of western scientist, but, holding in high esteem a certain religion and awe nature are distinguishing, believe in Christianity not to equal to hold in high esteem nature, any religious sections all have the contentses that oneself holds in high esteem, if can lump together arbitrarily because of the thing that all has awe, the of religious section can't have several thousand years of conflict.Moreover, even if was the scientist who believes in Christianity to do to contribute to science, also not ability affirm Christianity is science of, certainly can not even affirm to hold in high esteem nature is science.The author says"western culture emphasizes a host and guest opposition;Host and guest opposition, be think the person and cosmos is placed in two poles of opposition;But the premise of science is such.Western philosophy set person and the opposition of cosmos, person and others outside of the opposition of world.Opposition, on the other hand the creation stares at boundless blue sky of Hao of heart Zhan Li, then produce a detection and win on the other hand of impulse.The former is an awe,cheap beats by dre, the latter would is science." The author's parlance I completely agree with, the person and natural relation really has harmonious one side, there is also one side to stand opposite, is this a side of the opposition, result in°in people different attitude awe and science.Exactly explain here;In treating a person relationship with nature, the mental state holding in high esteem is as run in opposite directions as the spirit of science.The 1:00s that seems to be to explain that Mr. He Zuo Xiu says all right.Hold in high esteem the nature is anti- science. The author says"science send mankind up another road:On this road, the mankind discovered that they can control and win natural ability.This makes people feel to become God.When the person uses science means domination the whole, control everything, with go to can make a gram Long person come of time, person don't feel that oneself woulds be God?China from Opium War experience of everything be all molding a rule:Science of west woulds be to rescue all the magic weapons of the distresses;Science is highest;Who if anti- science, who is an anti- truth;Who if doubt science, who is the people's public enemy."The author's standpoint should classify to elaborate, among them"science of west would is to rescue all the magic weapons of the distresses" and"who if anti- science, who is an anti- truth" says of 1:00 also right;However say that"science is highest" says "who if doubt science, who is the people's public enemy" some excessively.Be welljust the authors' they's regretses in these words so much, seem to can not see clearly to say "science highest" and say the meaning of"who if doubt science, who is the people's public enemy" in He Zuo Xiu and the square boatman's article. Author the underneath these words"push science up the absolute being altar,did not disobey science spirit just?Is believing science omnipotent God,is not a kind of heart doctrine only?What academician vegetable come with defend science from reside.He it treats science as absolute being, whether just is the enemy whom he did science?"Also made same trouble, criticized contents' seeming to be not was the speech of the other party.The author defines the other party first to reject for"push science up the absolute being altar" then taking into again.The author finally got the conclusion of "push science is also anti- science up the absolute being altar".Even if is a thief to a little bit shout the critique of catching the thief, should also say the author's conclusion at 1:00 all right, but, express still not enough overall.Should say "absolute being altar on have no science".Is also say in addition to the author's topic exactitude, He Zuo Xiu, square boatman's conclusion also has no wrong.Because, not only is science, regardless you after chasing any thing and pushing the absolute being altar of last awe, all already there is no science to be talked. So, "hold in high esteem nature" also cut off is not likely to be science.The author says"square the boatman call"'s holding in high esteem great universe is anti- science".This argumentation hints at a premise:"Science can not be anti-", is call justice;Whereas to is then an offense.Does this say to establish to deny?Answer criticism it seems to be not to need an abstruse theory here, needs to ask 1:"The gram Long person woulds be science;Should science like this be anti-?The mankind make a nuclear weapon machine with the threat and coerce the same kind, should science like this be anti-?""The author asks so, not only elucidation not anti- science is correct, on the contrary explain appearing disorder on the author's logic thinking.The author gives examples oppose of, should be the concrete application of science but isn't science technique.Compare to a black guest of calculator to invade bank system thieves and burglars, punishment of should be thieves and burglars make but isn't network science technique. In addition, false because of the author's logic, also cause moreover a kind of make people elusive embarrassed.Namely;If anti- science also not definitely not to, so according to the topic of author's they's article, isn't the author also at negative they?The author says"in fact, environmental protection doctrine Wang always Ms. Chen certainly would not when the experienced star flies to the Earth the objection science household-use nuclear weapon machine destroys it-square the boatman greatly can trust:While establishing the ultimate end benefits of civilization, no one gets away from drop the dimensions of person's oneself, environmental protection doctrine is particularly such.The whole descriptions of environmental protection doctrine are all emphasizing the person's benefits, they while advicing the same kind, don't always use such of sentence type-"if don't protect forest, mankind meeting ……""if the animal destroys completely, mankind meeting ……""if the disrespect fears great universe, mankind meeting ……" tell that the all these is very heartless:Is the even if the firmest environmental protection doctrine, their values are also mankind doctrine in the center of."I believe that author's this sentence completely is big truth.Because, here in the world, whichever completely have pity for the person of other lives, have no food edible, also keep on being not likely to exist.So, beat to hold in high esteem doctrine in the ecosystem center of natural signal, can is divided into 2 types;1 type is to know careless, logic disorder;Is another then have ulterior motives of bogus.You can notice an observation;The slightest Be not willing to lower own life to enjoy while some people are holding in high esteem nature at Gao Han.(regardless in the domestic still abroad, also always have is some to declare to hold in high esteem nature of false environmental-protection advocate, usually beat a passion nature, the signal east of environmental protection rush west to walk, from conduct and actions that they arrive one to visit mountain to play water each time, not difficult the real interest of many people for discovering his door, be all day want to seek to lend to travel everywhere)Actually, a lot of extremisms of respectFearing natural signal is only people's development that wants to obstruct to owe a flourishing region, its purpose is to want to keep his/her own a certain advantage position.In fact, if they really need to think absolute awe nature and basically have no call to the protection for appealing naturally of slogan, the east rushes west to walk of visit mountain to play water everywhere, most simple, effective of way be make oneself bring trouble from full this person first of in the world disappear drop, provide more opportunities for the existence of other specieses.So, probably we still really should mean admiration to theirs "classic benevolence".However, almost having no an extreme environmental-protection advocate who makes impractical saying is willing to do like this. The author says"pour is a great universe, the from ancient times has no speech and have who come to represent it to make a truely ultimate end speech?-No one will throw the benefits that the person's basis defends great universe away.Only the environmental protection doctrine sees a little bit more farsightedly and think a little bit longer agoly for the mankind's benefits, Be not willing to condescend to take up a little bit ater present petty profits but place in the future in neglect."The author worries really and has a little excessively,did the author become the supporter of a "man is the master of his own fate" view again?Do you think that the protection that the great universe doesn't have these extreme members can not also exist?Don't worry needlessly, the mankind can not win nature, the breakage of the so-called mankind to the nature, also just exist environmental breakage by themselves to the mankind of nature.Originally naturally original have never needed the mankind protected it, the mankind protected natural action, actually and only be protection the mankind him/herself.Certainly, mankind for natural environment of Related articles:

• dr dre beats ot narrated in detai
• cheap dr dre beats he star once does wi
• http://www.outletmonsterbeatsinuk.com rt good bodyguard h
• http://www.outletmonsterbeatsinuk.com hat matterThe vulg